We’ve curated a list of publications, websites, convening notes, slide decks and more to help you make the case for the housing-health connection.
The Scorecard assesses all states on their relative ability to provide opportunities for residents to build and retain financial stability and wealth.
Get a 3D view of racial equity with a focus on performance, disparity, and impact.
An initiative of University of Virginia and the Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture, Thriving Cities equips city stakeholders to measure what it takes to thrive in their community.
Thriving Cities hosts a variety of tools to inform and equip all city stakeholders including the average resident, community leaders, and powerful institutions to tell the story of what it means to thrive in their community.
In 2015 Thriving Cities picked three pilot cities to began research based on the Human Ecology Framework. Read the city profiles here.
The Community Field Guide is a tool for residents to create data visualizations and infographics to help tell their distinct story.
RACE COUNTS measures the overall performance, amount of racial disparity, and impact by population size of every county in California.
RACE COUNTS is an initiative launched by Advancement Project California, USC PERE, PICO California and California CALLS that includes a comprehensive online tool ranking all 58 counties by seven issue areas critical to California’s future to paint a comprehensive picture of racial disparity in California.
The seven key issue areas are:
RACE COUNTS maps racial equity in California using a 3D analysis of performance, disparity and impact:
Find a full list of the partner organizations that informed this initiative.
The Prosperity Now Scorecard is a comprehensive resource for data on household financial health and policy recommendations to help put everyone in our country on a path to prosperity.
The Scorecard equips advocates, policymakers and practitioners with national, state, county and city data to jump-start a conversation about solutions and policies that put households on stronger financial footing across five issue areas: Financial Assets & Income, Businesses & Jobs, Homeownership & Housing, Health Care and Education. The Scorecard assesses all states on their relative ability to provide opportunities for residents to build and retain financial stability and wealth. The state outcome rankings are a measure of financial prosperity and how that prosperity is shared and safeguarded.
Also on the site you can find:
2018 Main Findings: Download or read the interactive version of Whose Bad Choices? How Policy Precludes Prosperity and What We Can Do About It, which highlights the main findings of the 2018 Scorecard.
Newsroom: Find links to the latest news, information about our experts, state and national press releases, and more.
Methodology: Learn about the framework within which the Scorecard is conceived, the methodology for assigning outcome rankings and grades, our approach to assessing policy adoption
Download the main findings and other resources from previous editions of the Scorecard
Numerous resources have recently been released detailing the connection between safe, affordable housing and good health. We’ve curated a list of publications, websites, convening notes, slide decks and more to help you make the case for the housing-health connection.
Addressing the Impact of Redevelopment on Community Health in Seattle’s Yesler Terrace, 2017, Evidence for Action, Public Health Seattle and King County, Seattle Housing Authority, and Neighborcare Health
ASTHO-CDC-HUD Convening Meetings Notes: Cross-Sector Partnership Models to Improve Health and Housing Outcomes, 2017, Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
The Connection between Health and Housing: The Evidence and Policy Landscape, 2015, Alliance for Health Reform
Health and Housing, Enterprise Community Partners, Inc.
Health and Housing 101: Understanding the Intersections, 2016, Community Catalyst
Health Impact Assessment and Housing, Guidance for Health and Housing Professionals, 2016 Pew Charitable Trusts
Housing and the Role of Hospitals, 2017, American Hospital Association, Health Research and Education Trust, and Association of Community Health Improvement
Housing and Health, 2011, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Housing as Health, 2017, Journal of the American Medial Association (JAMA) Forum
Housing Intersections, National Housing Conference and Center for Housing Policy
Innovative Models in Health and Housing, 2017, Mercy Housing and the Low Income Investment Fund
Leveraging Housing Vouchers to Address Health Disparities, 2017, American Journal of Public Health
This short report by UCSF and the Build Healthy Places Network reviews selected research on how physical, service, and social conditions in a community can influence health, for better or worse.
A large body of research has linked neighborhood conditions with health, including physical conditions, available services, and social conditions. Extensive research shows that low-income and minority neighborhoods are more likely to experience harmful conditions and to lack health-promoting conditions. Although children may be particularly vulnerable to the health effects of living in a disadvantaged place, health effects can extend into adulthood. A sampling of research-based evidence is included.
George Galster, an expert on neighborhoods and urban planning, describes the various neighborhood factors researchers believe influence health, and how. He notes that a consensus is emerging that four neighborhood factors—social cohesion, social control, spatial mismatch, and environmental hazards—have the strongest effects on personal outcomes.
This issue brief from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation examines the current evidence linking neighborhoods and health. It also reviews promising programs and interventions to make neighborhoods healthier places to live, learn, work, and play.
Just as conditions within our homes have important implications for our health, conditions in the neighborhoods surrounding our homes also can have major health effects. It explores the following questions:
• How can neighborhoods affect health?
• Are features of places really that important for health—or should we focus primarily on the individuals who live in them?
• Do all Americans have the opportunity to live in a healthy neighborhood?
• Could public and private policies improve neighborhoods in ways likely to improve America’s health?
The report provides examples of public, private, and joint public-private initiatives intended to make neighborhoods healthier.
Also included in this RWJF series are similar short reports on how housing, violence and social disadvantage, race and socioeconomic factors, income and wealth, education, and early childhood experiences affect health.
These brief fact sheets from the Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC) provide overviews of the evidence on health and health-care issues that are important in low-income communities.
The toolkit offers 21 “gold star” recommendations for promoting health in buildings and development projects. The toolkit is available digitally, as a downloadable pdf, and as a one-page visual summary, or go to the full site for additional details.
The recommendations cover:
A list of practical implementation strategies and best practices, grouped according to their available evidence base, supports each of the recommendations.
The recommendations and strategies are ranked by: